VALE FOOD COMPANY TAMPA
501 N FRANKLIN ST, TAMPA, Hillsborough County. DBPR licence 3917332. 20 inspection visits from 2023-10-23 to 2026-09-15.
Warning: inspector to returnLast visit, 2026-09-15: routine inspection, 1 high-priority, 4 intermediate, 2 basic violations
3 of 7routine inspections with more high-priority violations than the Hillsborough County average that year (1 had none)
0emergency closures recommended at an inspection since July 2023
4inspections prompted by a complaint
Every inspection visit
| Date | Visit | Result | High | Inter. | Basic | County avg | What was cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-15 | Routine inspection | Warning: inspector to return DBPR: Warning Issued |
1 | 4 | 2 | 0.93 | 5 areas
|
| 2026-05-27 | Complaint follow-up | Corrected at follow-up DBPR: Call Back - Complied |
0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2026-04-22 | Complaint follow-up | Corrected at follow-up DBPR: Call Back - Complied |
0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2026-04-20 | Complaint inspection | Referred for possible fine DBPR: Administrative complaint recommended |
2 | 0 | 0 | 2 areas
|
|
| 2026-03-26 | Complaint follow-up | More time given DBPR: Call Back - Extension given, pending |
0 | 1 | 0 | 1 area
|
|
| 2026-03-25 | Complaint follow-up | Not corrected at follow-up, referred for possible fine DBPR: Call Back - Admin. complaint recommended |
2 | 1 | 0 | 3 areas
|
|
| 2026-03-24 | Complaint inspection | Warning: inspector to return DBPR: Warning Issued |
5 | 1 | 1 | 6 areas
|
|
| 2025-12-08 | Complaint inspection | Passed, no follow-up needed DBPR: Inspection Completed - No Further Action |
0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2025-10-28 | Complaint inspection | Passed, no follow-up needed DBPR: Inspection Completed - No Further Action |
0 | 1 | 0 | 1 area
|
|
| 2025-10-17 | Follow-up visit | Corrected at follow-up DBPR: Call Back - Complied |
0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2025-10-13 | Routine inspection | Warning: inspector to return DBPR: Warning Issued |
1 | 1 | 0 | 1.01 | 2 areas
|
| 2025-03-28 | Follow-up visit | Corrected at follow-up DBPR: Call Back - Complied |
0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2025-03-26 | Follow-up visit | More time given DBPR: Call Back - Extension given, pending |
1 | 0 | 0 | 1 area
|
|
| 2025-03-20 | Routine inspection | Warning: inspector to return DBPR: Warning Issued |
4 | 2 | 0 | 0.99 | 4 areas
|
| 2025-01-21 | Follow-up visit | Corrected at follow-up DBPR: Call Back - Complied |
0 | 2 | 1 | 3 areas
|
|
| 2024-11-19 | Routine inspection | Warning: inspector to return DBPR: Warning Issued |
2 | 2 | 6 | 0.99 | 9 areas
|
| 2024-03-26 | Routine inspection | Passed, no follow-up needed DBPR: Inspection Completed - No Further Action |
1 | 0 | 4 | 1.02 | 5 areas
|
| 2024-01-08 | Routine inspection | Passed, no follow-up needed DBPR: Inspection Completed - No Further Action |
1 | 2 | 6 | 1.02 | 7 areas
|
| 2024-01-08 | Follow-up visit | Corrected at follow-up DBPR: Call Back - Complied |
0 | 0 | 2 | 1 area
|
|
| 2023-10-23 | Routine inspection | Warning: inspector to return DBPR: Warning Issued |
0 | 2 | 2 | 1.02 | 2 areas
|
A routine inspection is one visit on one day. Inspectors in different counties record violations differently, so compare a count with its county average, not with a restaurant in another county. Nothing on this page is a rating. Source: DBPR inspection files, data as of 2026-11-09; DBPR's own record for this licence is the official one.